THE RATIONALITY OF TESTIMONY
What is testimony?
A testimony is a statement or endorsement given by
someone who has a logical connection to the topic
and credible source. Testimony can be used to
explain or prove a point, and it is often used to refer
to the research of a species
Testimony is a very important part of philosophy.
Because the existence of an argument depends on
the testimony given for it. Testimony directly
influences the building of trust in people over an
argument. The veracity of that argument must be
clarified by giving reasons for the testimony
available for this. The expression 'testimony' in
everyday usage in English is confined to reports by
witnesses or by experts given in a courtroom, or
other formal setting. But in analytic philosophy the
expression is used as a label for the process by
which knowledge or belief is gained from
understanding and believing the spoken or written
reports of others generally, regardless of setting. In
a modern society testimony thus broadly
understood is one of the main sources of belief.
In philosophy, testimony is a proposition conveyed
by person or group to another person or group,
whether through speech or writing or through facial
expression, that is based on the person's or group's
knowledge base. The proposition believed on the
basis of a testimony is justified if conditions are
met which assess, among other things, the speaker's
reliability and the hearer's possession of positive
reasons. In short, testimony is the sole guarantee of
the truth of a matter.
Testimony alone does not make people believe it.
For that, the testimonies should be explained and
the reasons for it should be given. For this, care
must be taken with the logic of the testimonies. By
presenting such logical evidence, action should be
taken to instill confidence in people about it.
There are two types of testimony. That is peer
testimony and expert testimony.
Expert testimony is testimony given by a person
who is considered an expert by virtue of education,
training, certification, skills, and/or experience in a
particular matter. Peer testimony, unlike expert
testimony, is provided by a person who does not
have expertise in the subject in question.
Our epistemic dependence on past trusted testimony
People in the past had given more space to myth.
So sometimes the truth was overshadowed by
delusion. Those people believed that everything
happens because of an act by a god or a powerful
source. So people were afraid to argue. But with
scientific discoveries it was completely different.
There was a great deal of interest and curiosity in
people to explore new knowledge. So people got
rid of narrow mindedness and started arguing. This
had a huge impact on the advancement of
technology and science.
The subversion of this myth and the tendency of
people to seek new knowledge was a significant
event that coincided with the renaissance of
philosophy. Hence, people began to look at the
changes in the environment logically. This was the
basic foundation of social development. So people
had to break free from the myth that was based on
evidence from past rumors and seek new
knowledge. This was a great contribution to the
technological revolution.
References : Fricker, E., 2004. Testimony: Knowing
through being told. In Handbook of
epistemology (pp. 109-130). Springer,
Dordrecht.
-----THANK YOU-----
Comments
Post a Comment